Powerful reasons this exposed location is inappropriate for industrial (“innovation”) development.
The documents below provide important source materials relating to the proposed Phillip Road Site / Phillip Road Project in Roseville, California. This document library is intended to help residents, journalists, public officials, and interested members of the community review key records concerning the proposed development, rezoning, environmental review, and public response.
Available materials include the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), Notice of Violation (NOV), public comment letters submitted in opposition to the DEIR, and other records relevant to the City’s review of the proposed project. These documents help explain the potential environmental, land use, infrastructure, traffic, noise, air quality, water, and community impacts associated with the proposal.
Save Reason Farms provides these materials to support public transparency, informed civic participation, and meaningful review of the proposed changes affecting the Phillip Road Site.
Based on our review of the DEIR, it is clear that the DEIR fails as an informational document under CEQA and lacks substantial evidence to support its conclusions that the
The attached document is a March 23, 2026 comment letter from the Center for Biological Diversity that urges the City to correct the alleged deficiencies and prepare an EIR that
City should not approve or analyze a project-driven General Plan change before first deciding, through proper public planning and CEQA review.
The DEIR contains no analysis of the future development the pipe is physically designed to serve, and that absence reflects piecemealing.
A transportation plan is not successful if it works for adult drivers but not for a typical student traveling alone on foot or by bicycle.
The use of the word ‘innovation’ to describe the use for the site is vague, political, and deceptive. The commenter argues that the February 2026 Draft EIR for the Phillip
A promise to make a plan later is not a valid mitigation under CEQA.
We need the highest quality of life possible. That is why we bought homes here and chose to raise our families here.
Advanced manufacturing has no business being so close to neighborhoods, schools and sports fields.
Having tenants pay to mitigate pollutants off-site does not undo the localized health impacts of neighboring residents.
CEQA requires that mitigation measures be specific, feasible, and enforceable.
Solar panels are not optional. They are a main mitigation measure for this project.
Substantial, on-site GHG reductions measures must be included in this EIR to reduce the impact of this project to below the bright line level without the need of off-site mitigations.
The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issues this Notice of Violation (NOV) regarding the City of Roseville’s (City) proposed disposition of approximately 236.26 acres of land located
The DEIR acknowledges that the Phillip Road Project would create environmental impacts that cannot be fully mitigated, including significant and unavoidable impacts related to transportation, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions,
The strongest point made in this comment letter is that the DEIR shifts too much risk onto the public by relying on future mitigation, fees, and assumptions instead of requiring